103
In section “3.1 ES1: Information architecture and display” (p.6) of the reference document “05 CORDIS-Work-Plan [...]
The tenderer is invited to re-read "3.1 ES1: Information architecture and display" in the 2012 Work Plan [...]
15/05/2013
Answered
102
The 7th listed requirement for Case Study 2 of Lot 1 (Design and mock-up for a new CORDIS home page) [...]
The CORDIS website does not use the European Commission's CWCMS (corporate web content management system [...]
15/05/2013
Answered
101
How is the Tenderer expected to prove that it fulfils the aforementioned requirement? In Annex 11, Project [...]
The "Total amount and tenderer's amount of the contract" field on page 1/3 of the PARF is the appropriate [...]
15/05/2013
Answered
100
Our understanding is that the description of the project/activity (e.g. relevance of the project, project [...]
Your understanding is correct. Please note that the fields on page 1/3 of the PARF must also be filled [...]
15/05/2013
Answered
99
Our understanding is that the term “clients” involves all EU Institutions, European Commission DGs, other [...]
We confirm that your understanding is correct for the clients from the EU institutions but the term " [...]
15/05/2013
Answered
98
Our understanding is that proposals regarding communication must be provided for the following interactions [...]
The tenderer must provide concrete proposals regarding the effective communication and interaction between [...]
15/05/2013
Answered
97
It is our understanding that the Tenderer should provide the profiles that will compose the team and [...]
We confirm that the names of the members of the proposed team are not needed.
15/05/2013
Answered
96
Are there any specific profile requirements for the person to be assigned the role of Contract Coordinator [...]
See answer to question 47. No. It is up to the tenderers to assess which profile/person may be suitable [...]
15/05/2013
Answered
95
Please note that all questions below are valid for all Lots, unless otherwise specified. a) Tenderers [...]
a) Yes, tenderers may define different damage points for a specific KPI in different lots, tenderers [...]
15/05/2013
Answered
94
We understand that the tenderer should include into the proposed draft SLA the tables under the section [...]
Please note that the tenderer may propose higher values for damages points. Stricter thresholds and higher [...]
15/05/2013
Answered
93
Please confirm that all the above criteria refer and apply to the PARFs proposed by Tenderers. Otehrwise [...]
Your understanding is not correct. The technical and professional capacity of the tenderers will be judged [...]
15/05/2013
Answered
92
a) According to our understanding, the preferred way for ordering services will be through fixed price [...]
a) The preferred method for ordering services will be through fixed price orders. If this is not possible [...]
15/05/2013
Answered
91
a) According to our understanding, the Tenderer is not expected to present names and golden paragraphs [...]
a) Your understanding is correct. However please note that the contracts that may be signed at the end [...]
15/05/2013
Answered
90
According to our understanding Tenderers are not requested to provide any evidence concerning the above [...]
Except when otherwise specified elsewhere in the specifications, tenderers do not need to present evidence [...]
15/05/2013
Answered
89
Taking into consideration the page and characters limitation imposed for the technical award criteria [...]
Your understanding is correct. Only the heading title must be indicated for the sake of clarity, for [...]
15/05/2013
Answered
88
Regarding the calculation method for each activities contained on the Chapter Fixed price activities [...]
Staff time means time spent by staff during their journey and their stay in Luxembourg or Brussels, beyond [...]
15/05/2013
Answered
87
Q1 : Please clarify the average number of test steps per test case documented ? Q2 : Where the current [...]
Q1) On average there are three test steps per case. Q2) Current requirements are stored in CIRCABC if [...]
15/05/2013
Answered
86
CORDIS, Volume II – Lot3, ANNEX 11, PROJECT/ACTIVITY REFERENCE FORM: Please, elaborate on the following [...]
The relevance of the different points indicated in page 2/3 of the PARF is directly related to the number [...]
15/05/2013
Answered
85
Q1 : Out of the existing test cases, how many of them have been automated ? Q2 : What are the versions [...]
Q1) About 10% of the existing test cases were automated with Selenium and java (the SDM application). [...]
15/05/2013
Answered
84
Corrigendum on our own initiative
Please note that a new version of the price schedule and estimation form for Lot 2 has been uploaded [...]
15/05/2013
Answered
83
The table of performance indicators in the terms of reference mention a minimum number of damage points [...]
In the framework of the second sub-criterion of award criterion No 4. for lots 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 and of [...]
14/05/2013
Answered
82
Is it possible to propose additional profiles other than those mentioned in the price grids? If yes, [...]
No. Please note that point 2.9.1, page 17, of Volume I of the Specifications for all lots specifies that [...]
14/05/2013
Answered
81
In addition to your response in clarification question 20: 1. Please note that an updated Pricing Schedule [...]
A new version of the price schedule and estimation form for Lot 4 has been uploaded to the document library [...]
14/05/2013
Answered
80
In accordance to the specifications of Lot 4 (page 22) the applied damage points for KPI – R- 1 are as [...]
Please note that in point 4.12, page 22, of Volume II of the specifications for Lot 4, KPI-R-1 is deleted [...]
14/05/2013
Answered
79
Could you please precise your exact expectations in terms of deliverables ? Presentation only ? Formal [...]
Presentations (Powerpoint or equivalent) must be prepared on the topic requested by the Publications [...]
14/05/2013
Answered