Sīkāka informācija par uzaicinājumu uz konkursu

Virsraksts:
Atsevišķs pakalpojumu pamatnolīgums par palīdzību un tehnisko atbalstu LIFE prie...
Līgumslēdzēja iestāde:
European Innovation Council and Small and Medium-sized EnterprisesExecutive Agen...
Publicēšanas datums TED:
26/10/2017
Piedāvājumu saņemšanas termiņš:
12/12/2017
Statuss:
Slēgts
Rādīt filtra parametrus

Results per page: 10 | 25 | 50 24 Jautājumi found, displaying all Jautājumi .
# Jautājums Atbilde Jaunākais publicēšanas datums Statuss
24
Could you please clarify what will be the exact start date for implementation of the 2018-2020 LIFE evaluation [...]
The Contracting Authority aims at launching the first service request for evaluation of the 2018 LIFE [...]
01/12/2017
23
Could you please clarify whether the criterion A4 regarding project evaluations in the annex 2.2 also [...]
In the context of this call for tenders Criterion A4 regarding project evaluations is to be understood [...]
30/11/2017
22
Could you kindly confirm that the template to be used for the CVs is the latest Europass version?
We confirm that the template to be used, as far as possible, is the latest Europass version.
27/11/2017
21
Could you please confirm that in case of a two-stage selection process, concept notes can only be submitted [...]
Yes, we can confirm that in case of a two-stage selection process, it will only be possible to submit [...]
23/11/2017
20
Could you please clarify which documents will be accepted as language certificates?
Any official document certifying the knowledge of the language at at least C1 level.
20/11/2017
19
On the page 84, it is stated that "the tenderer must provide references for 2 completed projects delivered [...]
The language coverage of 12 EU official languages can be covered by more than one project reference.
14/11/2017
18
Could you please specify whether a completed component (outputs approved by the EC) of an ongoing project [...]
As a general rule, the references for projects need to be for delivered (which means completed) projects [...]
14/11/2017
17
Could you please provide us with a definition of “an advanced electronic signature based on qualified [...]
Please follow this link to find out about different types of electronic signatures: https://ec.europa.eu [...]
13/11/2017
16
Could you please whether all CVs that form part of this tender have to be submitted in the Europass format [...]
We confirm that the Europass format should be used as far as possible to facilitate the assessment by [...]
13/11/2017
15
For the documentary evidence relating to the professional capacity criteria, could you please clarify [...]
With regards to the B Criteria the minimum evidence will include CVs and language certificates, however [...]
13/11/2017
14
Can you please clarify whether the number of working units as defined on p. 70-73 is calculated per expert [...]
The number of working units as defined on p.70-73 is calculated per expert for the evaluation or for [...]
13/11/2017
13
On the page 9 it is stated that the time allowed for the revision of “one stage calls” is 3-4 months [...]
All the timetables for future calls provided in the tender specifications are indicative only and should [...]
13/11/2017
12
On the page 20 it is mentioned that “the tenderer should provide a list of 5 potential financial experts [...]
There is indeed a contradiction on this point in the tender specifications. The tenderer must provide [...]
13/11/2017
11
On the page 20 of the TORs it is mentioned that the financial experts groups will be responsible for [...]
There is indeed a contradiction on this point in the ToRs. We would expect the project assistants to [...]
13/11/2017
10
We understand the evaluation covers the proposals submitted under the LIFE programme for the period January [...]
The FWC is expected to be signed in March/April 2018 for an initial period of 24 months. As set out in [...]
13/11/2017
9
On the page 83, the evidence for the criteria B1, B2, B4, B5 and B6 are requested. Could you please clarify [...]
Yes, evidence for criteria B3 should also be provided.
10/11/2017
8
Could you please confirm whether an extract of the contracting authority’s online system for evaluation [...]
Yes, we can confirm that this will be considered sufficient.
10/11/2017
7
In order to have a more comprehensive understanding of the scope of the LIFE programme, could you please [...]
For full details on the type of beneficiaries that can apply for the capacity building projects, please [...]
10/11/2017
6
Could you please clarify whether the “illustrative tasks” (mentioned on page 88) refer to the tasks 1 [...]
Yes, " illustrative tasks" refer to the tasks 1-7.
10/11/2017
5
Could you please clarify whether a third evaluation will be triggered in case of divergence in the scores [...]
No third evaluation will be triggered in case of divergence in the scores in the subtask 2a "LIFE traditional [...]
10/11/2017
4
In case the Contracting Authority decides to launch two-stage calls, could you provide us an estimate [...]
The Contracting Authority intends to set at 10 the maximum number of pages for the concept notes. Furthermore [...]
10/11/2017
3
In the case the Contracting Authority decides to launch two-stage calls, could you please provide us [...]
It is not possible for the Contracting Authority to provide an answer to this question as there are no [...]
10/11/2017
2
In case the fees indicated in the annex 7 are applied “by proposal”, what remuneration is foreseen for [...]
Fees indicated in annex 7 do not apply by proposal.
10/11/2017
1
For the subtasks 2C, 2D, 3A, 4A, 4F, 5A, could you please specify whether the fees foreseen in the annex [...]
The fixed fees foreseen in annex 7 in the column "unit price" for the subtasks at reference are to be [...]
10/11/2017