24
|
(a) Can you please confirm the handover period in case of replacement is 10-15 days? (b) Is Parallel [...]
|
(a) As stated in point 6.3. Replacement of the Technical Specifications "The handover period (where both [...]
|
11/10/2019
|
|
74
|
A list of certifications are requested for the Back-End and Front-End Developer. Unlike other profile [...]
|
In “Technical Specifications, Annex 10: List of profiles”, whenever more than one certification is mentioned [...]
|
30/10/2019
|
|
52
|
a) Could you please clarify the size of ISDLS incumbent team? b) What is the exact size and composition [...]
|
The size of the existing team is not relevant for this call for tenders. As stated in Annex 3 – Technical [...]
|
21/10/2019
|
|
38
|
According to Q&A #33, our understanding is that in case tenderers aim to bring a subcontractor whose [...]
|
As stated in point 4.2 of tender specifications "Tenderers must give an indication of the tasks that [...]
|
17/10/2019
|
|
5
|
Art. I.6.3 point 2 of draft FWC. Why is the payment term 60 days?
|
As indicated in the said article of the draft FWC, the contracting authority decided to set the payment [...]
|
26/09/2019
|
|
51
|
As part of the financial model, EEAS refer to 61 FTE’s. In the “technical specification” document page [...]
|
All figures are correct. 70 FTE (61 + 9) represents the “estimated number of FTE per year”, for the total [...]
|
21/10/2019
|
|
4
|
At page 8 of the technical specifications, the RFP reads “Near shore: The Contractor will provide the [...]
|
We confirm that any location within the European Union is compliant.
|
26/09/2019
|
|
9
|
Can the CA confirm that TM and QTM can be invoiced on a monthly basis?
|
As mentioned in the article 3.2 of ANNEX III of the modified Draft Framework Contract, the invoicing [...]
|
27/09/2019
|
|
48
|
Can we please request an extension of the submission deadline by 1 week?
|
Please note that we do not consider extending the deadline. The deadline for the submission of tenders [...]
|
18/10/2019
|
|
28
|
Can you please confirm that it is not obligatory to propose resources with security clearance?
|
As stated in point 5.2. Security Clearance of the Technical Specifications, "All staff proposed by the [...]
|
14/10/2019
|
|