Pakkumiskutse andmed

Pealkiri:
Asutuseväline IT-teenuste osutamine
Tellija:
European Parliament, DG Innovation and Technological support (ITEC)
TEDis avaldamise kuupäev:
04/08/2018
Pakkumuste vastuvõtmise tähtaeg:
20/09/2018
Olek:
Suletud
Näita filtreerimisparameetreid

Results per page: 10 | 25 | 50 327 Küsimused found, displaying 91 to 100.[First/Prev] 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 [Next/Last]
# Küsimus Vastus Viimati avaldatud: Olek
237
With reference to Part B to Technical Specifications - Profiles, Section “Professional experience”, “ [...]
Your understanding is not correct. In your example of L3-PANL profile, experience of "minimum 5 years [...]
10/09/2018
236
Kind reminder of my question submitted on 20/08/2018. In Lot 3 - Case Study 3, Sourcing part it is stated [...]
Please see answer to Question232
10/09/2018
235
Due to the new modifications in the "02 ITS19 - Tender Specifications " document, albeit not major, could [...]
No additional extension of the time limit for the submission of tenders is granted.
10/09/2018
234
Regarding the Proof of attendance to training for the profile “Solution Specialist” (L3-PSSP), could [...]
Yes, your understanding is correct.
10/09/2018
233
Question No 220 appears incomplete on the website but complete on the e-mail received, so allow me to [...]
Yes. A certificate of completion of a course is accepted.
10/09/2018
232
In Lot 3 - Case Study 3, Sourcing part it is stated that: "European Parliament is willing to work preferably [...]
No, there is no typo. You must understand from the sentence that, when feasible, the European Parliament [...]
10/09/2018
231
With reference to “Part G to Technical Specifications -Technical and professional capacity questionnaire [...]
Your understanding is not correct. Certificates mentioned in the three CVs must be included.
10/09/2018
230
With reference to “Annex 1 - ITS19 CV TEMPLATE” of the document “Part G to Technical Specifications, [...]
Yes, your understanding is correct.
10/09/2018
229
In case subcontracting is envisaged and subcontractor’s staff is presented in “3.1 Staffing table” as [...]
Your understanding is correct, provided that the subcontractors in question are not necessary to reach [...]
10/09/2018
228
a) In our tender we intend to propose a subcontractor and our understanding is that the documents requested [...]
a) No. Concerning sub-contractors, please follow instructions provided in Annex V to Tender specifications [...]
10/09/2018