Detalji poziva na dostavu ponuda

Naziv:
Pružanje usluga osiguranja kvalitete, kontrole kvalitete i upravljanja projektim...
Javni naručitelj:
European Commission, DG Taxation and Customs Union (TAXUD)
Datum objave na TED-u:
15/02/2017
Rok za primitak ponuda:
03/04/2017
Status:
Zatvoreno
Prikažite parametre filtriranja

Results per page: 10 | 25 | 50 36 Pitanja found, displaying all Pitanja .
# Pitanje Odgovor Posljednji datum objave Status
1
Is it allowed to subcontract part of the activities to a country that is neither an EU Member State nor [...]
No. As indicated in section II.2.3 (Place of performance) of the Contract Notice, the services are to [...]
06/03/2017
2
In order to allow an accurate price calculation of the FAT work Package (WP.9.6.1A & WP.9.6.1B), [...]
WP.9.6.1A: average duration: 15 days (possibly with interruptions) WP.9.6.1B: average duration: 2 days [...]
15/03/2017
3
We understand that the envelope constituting the Financial tender must consist of Section 6 from the [...]
- The envelope constituting the Financial tender should only contain the Price table (Annex 3). - On [...]
15/03/2017
4
Our understanding is that freelancers do not need to fill in Section 1.3 from Questionnaire (pages 9- [...]
As indicated in the Questionnaire, freelancers are subcontractors and therefore must complete section [...]
15/03/2017
5
Our understanding is that subcontractors do not need to provide an ISO certificate or any other relevant [...]
Your understanding is correct. The first paragraph of "Section 4 - Selection of the Tenderer / technical [...]
15/03/2017
6
In Questionnaire Annex 1, section 1.2.13. “Power of attorney” it is stated: “In case of a joint offer [...]
No. Please also note that the power of attorney should only be submitted by the winning tenderer when [...]
15/03/2017
7
Regarding pages 11 and 12 from Annex 4 “Guidebook for Tenderers”, section 6.4.3. “Elements to be separated [...]
Folder 1 must contain 1 original + 2 copies of - all documents related to Annex 1 - Questionnaire pages [...]
15/03/2017
8
With reference to paragraph 4.4.3 of the Questionnaire, please confirm that the ISO certificates listed [...]
Your understanding is correct
15/03/2017
9
With reference to paragraph 4.2.1 of the Questionnaire, please confirm that certificates issued by contracting [...]
Your understanding is correct. Nevertheless, DG TAXUD reminds that Section 4.2 requires "References in [...]
15/03/2017
10
With reference to paragraph 4.2.3 of the Questionnaire, please confirm that Service Reference Forms ( [...]
1st point - Your understanding is correct: Service Reference Forms (Attachment 1) to be submitted should [...]
15/03/2017
11
Concerning paragraph 1.2.12 of the Questionnaire, please confirm that in case of a joint tender only [...]
We do not confirm. Section 1.2 clearly indicates that it must be completed as many times as there are [...]
15/03/2017
12
With reference to paragraph 4.4.4., please specify if evidence of “recent and dated report of maturity [...]
no specific certificate is required
15/03/2017
13
With reference to members of tenderers’ staff (“up to a maximum of 35 profiles”), please specify if each [...]
No technical requirement has been specified in relation to each profile. It is the tenderer's responsibility [...]
15/03/2017
14
Our organization has been included as subcontractor in an awarded tender with DG TAXUD but subcontracting [...]
We confirm this situation is not relevant to the “segregation of duties at the management, control, quality [...]
15/03/2017
18
Referring to the declaration of honour on exclusion criteria and selection criteria to be completed and [...]
your understanding is correct
15/03/2017
17
Article 1.5.1 of the General Terms and Conditions refers to Article II.4 of the General Conditions. Unless [...]
We confirm, the correct reference should be to Article II.15. A new version of the model contract is [...]
15/03/2017
15
We understand that §§2, 3 and 4 of article II.18.4 of the General Conditions for the framework contract [...]
Your understanding is incorrect. The second, third and fourth paragraphs of Article II.18.4 fully apply [...]
15/03/2017
16
Under article II.23.2 of General Conditions for the framework contract, the contracting authority has [...]
your understanding is correct
15/03/2017
19
With reference to “paragraph 4.2.1”, please confirm that a branch-company A of a Group, based in an EU [...]
Yes we confirm that a branch-company A of a Group, based in an EU Member Country, can rely on the capacity [...]
20/03/2017
20
With reference to the “Declaration of honour on exclusion criteria and selection criteria” template annexed [...]
Yes this is correct. A new version of the Declaration of honour is available
20/03/2017
21
We notice a considerable difference between the volumes in the historical baseline, compared to the volumes [...]
The increase of volumes is not caused by the introduction of the proportionality principle. The justification [...]
20/03/2017
22
The Technical Annex2.B describes that no daily reports are requested in scope of WP.9.5.2 (quality control [...]
We do confirm that no daily reports are requested for Category 1 conformance tests. The average duration [...]
20/03/2017
23
Are we correct in assuming that the information requested in Chapter 4.2 of the questionnaire is to be [...]
Yes the information is to be provided in Attachment 1 - Service Reference Form of the Questionnaire.
20/03/2017
24
We posted a number of questions on the portal, can you confirm the estimated time of response of these [...]
The replies to these questions have been answered on 15/03/2017
20/03/2017
25
We would like to request the extension of the submission deadline, considering that the offer is complex [...]
Considering that (1) The time-limit for receipt of tenders is minimum 42 days and that the Contracting [...]
20/03/2017
26
Can you confirm that travels that can be requested in the context of the QA4 activities (Missions, audits [...]
We do confirm that travels will be requested in the context of QA4 activities (missions, audits, QC of [...]
20/03/2017
27
According to section “5.1.3 Hand-over” of the Questionnaire, the contractor is called to show its plan [...]
We do confirm a clerical mistake. Section “5.1.3 Hand-over” of the Questionnaire should read: "Its proposed [...]
20/03/2017
28
In case of services provided to a private purchaser certified by the service provider through a declaration [...]
We do confirm that the client contact is mandatory. As stated in Section "4.2.1. Client References (Mandatory [...]
20/03/2017
29
According to the WP2 Take-over, included in “Annex 2b: Technical Annex”, the contractor is called to [...]
The QA3 Hand-over Plan will be requested to the existing contractor once the results of QA4 Call for [...]
20/03/2017
30
Due to the fact that the column width is blocked, the totals are not visible and show as #########. Can [...]
The column "Estimated budget TOTAL" of sheet TBP has been extended. An updated Price Table is published [...]
24/03/2017
31
There are only 35 lines to enter profiles in the Profile Pi Pricing sheet of the price table. Can this [...]
No; tenderers can indicate maximum 35 profiles
24/03/2017
32
As per your answer n° 19, can you please confirm that the tenderer can rely on references of its affiliated [...]
No we do not confirm; our reply to Q19 was incomplete and should be read as follows : 1) As per Art 146.5 [...]
24/03/2017
33
Regarding to the contract notice with No: 2017/S 032-057176 dated on 15.02.2017 under the name "Belgium [...]
As indicated in the contract notice under the section IV.1.8, this procedure is covered by the Agreement [...]
24/03/2017
34
With regard to technical and professional criteria, we understand that if company A aims to provide a [...]
Please refer to our replies to questions 19 and 32
28/03/2017
35
Your response to questions around eligibility and subcontracting for this procedure are contradictory [...]
There is indeed an inconsistency in the replies. The reply to Q33 should read "No, you are not eligible [...]
28/03/2017
36
When completing the V2.00 of the price table we notice that for the Work Packages WP.9.9 the profile [...]
This is not correct. WP 9.10 should be linked to the "in contractor's premises" prices calculated in [...]
30/03/2017