|
87
|
1. I.3.3 Reimbursement of expenses Not applicable Is it possible to describe reimbursable cost in specific [...]
|
ESMA will not consider the request. In reference to the question: 'should we also describe it in the [...]
|
23/07/2015
|
|
|
86
|
4. II.3.4 Please consider altering cl. II.3.4. as follows: “The Contractor shall indemnify and hold ESMA [...]
|
ESMA will not consider the request.
|
23/07/2015
|
|
|
85
|
6. II.13.1 Suspension by the Contractor Please consider adding additional reason for suspension by the [...]
|
ESMA will not consider the request.
|
23/07/2015
|
|
|
84
|
8. Please consider adding a non-solicit provisions to the FWC, as follows: “Article I.12 - Non-hire and [...]
|
ESMA will not consider the request.
|
23/07/2015
|
|
|
83
|
Answering of questions.
|
The tender specifications provides a deadline for questions of 21/07/2015. However, ESMA informs tenderers [...]
|
23/07/2015
|
|
|
82
|
Questions a) Chapter 5 includes several factors to be taken into consideration for the calculation of [...]
|
The complexity assessment is only relevant at the specific contract stage. At that stage ESMA will work [...]
|
22/07/2015
|
|
|
81
|
Could you specify what will be evaluated under this criterion and how tenderers can achieve full points [...]
|
Information is easy to find, well categorised, referenced well and enables information supporting tenderers [...]
|
22/07/2015
|
|
|
80
|
In the above Annex we read: “The application functional size is determined by the number of function [...]
|
• Correct, the complexity assessment does not impact the (unadjusted) function point count • The complexity [...]
|
22/07/2015
|
|
|
79
|
In section 3.2.1 we read: “4. A description of the mechanism to guarantee the business continuity and [...]
|
Confirmed.
|
22/07/2015
|
|
|
78
|
Questions related to Function Point Count for Maintenance In the document named "Track changes_AIFMDReporting_v1 [...]
|
Tenderers are requested to conduct the Function Point-analysis with what has been provided. They are, [...]
|
22/07/2015
|
|
|
77
|
In the document named "Track changes_AIFMDReporting_v1_4_vs_v1.3" we understand that the changes that [...]
|
Tenderers are requested to conduct the Function Point-analysis with what has been provided. They are, [...]
|
22/07/2015
|
|
|
76
|
Could you please clarify which are the expected working hours for the SL2 and SL3 support service of [...]
|
Please refer to the answer given in Question 7. For Lot2 all services are by Times and Means and working [...]
|
22/07/2015
|
|
|
75
|
Please explain the following in relation to section 3.2.2 “Economic and financial capacity“ and the requested [...]
|
The purpose of the insurance is not correctly understood in the question. The purpose is to ensure that [...]
|
21/07/2015
|
|
|
74
|
In the above Annex we read: “Application Maintenance Services - Activities associated with repairing [...]
|
a) Correct. b) This has been further clarified in an update to Annex IX and Annex XIV (minor changes [...]
|
21/07/2015
|
|
|
73
|
We have a global contract with our insurer and each time we sign a new contract our insurer provides [...]
|
Confirmed.
|
21/07/2015
|
|
|
72
|
We refer to the following parts: Page 102 “My on-going actions (section 3) retrieved with the search [...]
|
Tenderers are requested to conduct the Function Point-analysis with what has been provided. They are, [...]
|
21/07/2015
|
|
|
71
|
In the answer to question 3 we read: “The tenderer can meet this selection criterion by demonstrating [...]
|
The projects must be within the last 3 years.
|
21/07/2015
|
|
|
70
|
a) We understand that No CVs for the profiles described in Annex XVI - Profile Specifications need to [...]
|
Confirmed.
|
21/07/2015
|
|
|
69
|
referring to the above, we read: "The tenderer must demonstrate experience, by describing 3 contracts [...]
|
Yes, tenderers may choose to include more than 3 projects.
|
21/07/2015
|
|
|
68
|
In the cover letter it is mentioned: The tenders must be submitted: b) In triplicate, with one unbound [...]
|
For the administrative offer - only those parts mentioned in 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 (legal capacity and financial [...]
|
21/07/2015
|
|
|
67
|
Invitation Letter, page 1, 1b: “In triplicate, with one unbound original and two bound copies……” Question [...]
|
Confirmed.
|
21/07/2015
|
|
|
66
|
We noticed that after point 5 follows point 7. Is there a point 6?
|
Indeed, this is a clerical error. There is no point 6.
|
21/07/2015
|
|
|
65
|
In the above Annex we read: “1: The organisational structure supported by a single structure chart (i.e [...]
|
a) If there are different functional teams within the tenderer's organisation that are pertinent to the [...]
|
21/07/2015
|
|
|
64
|
Questions a) Please confirm that only questions 3.1.2.1 and 3.1.3.1 are subject to page and word limits [...]
|
a) Confirmed. b) Confirmed. c) Either is acceptable, ESMA requests that either way the answers are clearly [...]
|
21/07/2015
|
|
|
63
|
Could you please confirm that the scope of the scenario is the update of the AIFMDReporting software [...]
|
This question was partially answered in 58 The scope of the scenario is the whole of the functional specifications [...]
|
21/07/2015
|
|
|
62
|
Could you please clarify what is the expected distribution of volume between SL2 services and Ad-Hoc [...]
|
ESMA cannot project any type of expected volume for ad-hoc studies (for any lot). These shall be initiated [...]
|
21/07/2015
|
|
|
61
|
Could you please clarify what is the expected volume of Ad-Hoc Studies in the frame of Lot3?
|
ESMA cannot project any type of expected volume for ad-hoc studies (for any lot). These shall be initiated [...]
|
21/07/2015
|
|
|
60
|
In the above Annex we read: “A 10th category has been added for applications and projects that cannot [...]
|
Category 10 has been removed. Please refer to question 38 in which this has previously been notified.
|
21/07/2015
|
|
|
59
|
In the new version of the Financial form, the Productivity categories have been aligned with their definitions [...]
|
The tenderer is correct. The form financial offer form has been aligned.
|
20/07/2015
|
|
|
58
|
Related to the function point counting for maintenance, what would be the exact scope? Is the intention [...]
|
For AIFMD it is the scope of the added functionality and not the whole system (REGST). For SARIS it is [...]
|
20/07/2015
|
|
|
57
|
Is there database design document available for documentation?
|
Each system will have a documentation set. For most systems this includes a database design.
|
20/07/2015
|
|
|
56
|
Is the nationality of the proposed resource important?
|
No, the nationality is not important.
|
20/07/2015
|
|
|
55
|
Can we propose resources who have experience in other ESB technology which is equivalent to WSO2 for [...]
|
No, other technologies will not be deemed as equivalent.
|
20/07/2015
|
|
|
54
|
Annex XI presents the existing ESMA applications that fall under the scope of Lot3 agreement and might [...]
|
The answers to these questions can be found in: 1. In Annex XI where you will find the Stacks and Middleware [...]
|
20/07/2015
|
|
|
53
|
Tender Specifications, Section 3.2.3 “Technical and professional capacity (see division between Lots) [...]
|
Confirmed.
|
18/07/2015
|
|
|
52
|
Are tenderers allowed to submit in the same proposals CVs in different languages, namely French and English [...]
|
CVs submitted in French shall be permissible, however ESMA strongly urges tenderers to submit their offers [...]
|
17/07/2015
|
|
|
51
|
In the scope of Lot 3 "Application development and maintenance services", could you please explain the [...]
|
The tenderer has no basis for an assertion that any profiles will be used more or less than any other [...]
|
17/07/2015
|
|
|
50
|
In the scope of Lot 2 "Business Support", could you please explain the role of Production engineer, production [...]
|
The tenderer has no basis for an assertion that any profiles will be used more or less than any other [...]
|
17/07/2015
|
|
|
49
|
In the scope of Lot 1 "Service desk", could you please explain the role of Project Manager, Business [...]
|
The tenderer has no basis for an assertion that any profiles will be used more or less than any other [...]
|
17/07/2015
|
|
|
48
|
"5.4 Appendix 4: Reference tables” section has no information in document “2013-ITMG-18 - AIFMD Reporting [...]
|
Tenderers are requested to conduct the Function Point-analysis with what has been provided. They are, [...]
|
17/07/2015
|
|
|
47
|
Could you please share the file/database design document for RDS Database and ‘Suspension from Trading [...]
|
Tenderers are requested to conduct the Function Point-analysis with what has been provided. They are, [...]
|
17/07/2015
|
|
|
46
|
a) Could you please provide us some examples of typical incidents that are in scope of the Lot1-SL2 technical [...]
|
Lot 1/SL2 • Monitoring alerts on servers (cpu, disk full) o Disk space alerts o CPU usage • Incidents [...]
|
16/07/2015
|
|
|
45
|
The Tender Specification document section 2.6 “General Constraints” says that all team members should [...]
|
Question already answered Q14.
|
16/07/2015
|
|
|
44
|
According to the Tender Specifications, the Contractor will provide for the needs of the Lot2 Contract [...]
|
ESMA confirms that this is generally correct. ESMA expects a growth in the area of business support which [...]
|
16/07/2015
|
|
|
43
|
With reference to Annex XIII- ‘Technical offer form’; Section 3.3. Proposed methods; Award question 7 [...]
|
This statement has been reworded in Annex XIII (track changes visible). An additional Annex is added [...]
|
16/07/2015
|
|
|
42
|
With reference to Annex XIII- ‘Technical offer form’; Section 3.2.1. Proposed organisation and infrastructure [...]
|
This was a clerical error and has been corrected in Annex XIII. Track changes visible.
|
16/07/2015
|
|
|
41
|
In the Annex IX page 5, the productivity matrix shows productivity category N°1 "Low/Small" and N°9 " [...]
|
The suggestion is taken on board, and Annex XIV has been updated accordingly to avoid confusion.
|
16/07/2015
|
|
|
40
|
The Category N°10 is defined as not being classified in the 9 productivity category. Therefore, not being [...]
|
Category 10 has been removed from Annexes XIV, IX and the tender specifications. Track changes visible [...]
|
16/07/2015
|
|
|
39
|
"See Annex IV for a full list of application ..." Could you please confirm that Annex XI "ICT system [...]
|
This was a clerical error. The correct Annex reference is indeed Annex XI. This has been corrected in [...]
|
16/07/2015
|
|
|
38
|
Productivity Category N°10 for Application maintenance is specified as "Low/Small" exactly as Category [...]
|
This was a clerical error. Category 10 has been removed from the financial offer form Annex XIV.
|
16/07/2015
|
|