|
1
|
We understand that the Technical proposal includes Annexes 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Could you please clarify [...]
|
a) Information submitted under Annex 2 shall be evaluated overall, is not attributed to any particular [...]
|
23/09/2019
|
|
|
2
|
We understand that the Technical proposal shall not exceed 80 pages in length (including annexes). The [...]
|
We expect examples illustrating tenderers' answers. Those examples do not need to be complete documents [...]
|
25/09/2019
|
|
|
3
|
Our understanding is that the financial identification form must be submitted by the leader of the consortium [...]
|
Yes, your understanding is correct.
|
25/09/2019
|
|
|
4
|
At page 8 of the technical specifications, the RFP reads “Near shore: The Contractor will provide the [...]
|
We confirm that any location within the European Union is compliant.
|
26/09/2019
|
|
|
9
|
Can the CA confirm that TM and QTM can be invoiced on a monthly basis?
|
As mentioned in the article 3.2 of ANNEX III of the modified Draft Framework Contract, the invoicing [...]
|
27/09/2019
|
|
|
10
|
How are quarterly measured LDUs linked to monthly invoices and monthly supporting Service Acceptance [...]
|
As indicated in SLA (Chapter 3.), the liquidated damages are calculated on a quarterly basis. Similarly [...]
|
27/09/2019
|
|
|
5
|
Art. I.6.3 point 2 of draft FWC. Why is the payment term 60 days?
|
As indicated in the said article of the draft FWC, the contracting authority decided to set the payment [...]
|
26/09/2019
|
|
|
6
|
Our understanding is that there are no CVs to be submitted at tender submission deadline (28/10/2019) [...]
|
We confirm there are no CVs to be submitted at tender submission deadline (28/10/2019).
|
26/09/2019
|
|
|
7
|
In the Tender Specifications, Section 5, Criterion 5.3.3.a), Minimum capacity level, p. 8, we read “At [...]
|
We confirm that all the mentioned examples are considered acceptable.
|
26/09/2019
|
|
|
8
|
In the Tender Specifications, Section 5, Criterion 5.3.3.a), Minimum capacity level, p. 8, we read “Each [...]
|
We confirm that your understanding is correct.
|
26/09/2019
|
|
|
12
|
With reference to Section 5.3.3 Technical and professional capacity criteria and evidence of tender specifications [...]
|
By indicating "past three calendar years" we mean the past three calendar years for which accounts have [...]
|
01/10/2019
|
|
|
11
|
With reference to “List of previous contracts“ table of Request to participate form, the “main registration [...]
|
We confirm your understanding. The main registration number of the economic operator who signed the contract [...]
|
01/10/2019
|
|
|
14
|
In the document Request to participate form, page 4, list of previous contracts, value in the currency [...]
|
The tenderers have to include the contract value during the past three calendar years (for which accounts [...]
|
01/10/2019
|
|
|
13
|
In the document Request to participate form, page 4, list of previous contracts, Our understanding is [...]
|
Yes, your understanding is correct.
|
01/10/2019
|
|
|
15
|
Is the understanding that FWC will be awarded to a single economic operator and that it does not imply [...]
|
Indeed, the understanding is correct. The framework contract will be awarded to a single economic operator [...]
|
03/10/2019
|
|
|
16
|
We would like to request more time in order to engineer the best possible service for EEAS. Could you [...]
|
Please note that we do not consider extending the deadline. The deadline for the submission of tenders [...]
|
04/10/2019
|
|
|
19
|
In Question 3.3 Annex 5 of technical specifications it is requested to specify the necessary technical [...]
|
The award sub-criterion 3.3 requests to specify “How you will ensure that the technical infrastructure [...]
|
08/10/2019
|
|
|
18
|
In Question 3.4 Annex 5 of technical specifications, can you please confirm our understanding that the [...]
|
Award sub-criterion 3.4 refers to both types of Services: Time and Means and Quoted Time and Means.
|
08/10/2019
|
|
|
17
|
On Question 3.5 Annex 5 of the technical specifications, can you please confirm our understanding that [...]
|
The award sub-criterion 3.5 requests to “specify which measures, tools and processes you commit to implement [...]
|
08/10/2019
|
|
|
27
|
In point 3.5 of the technical specifications you group the profiles under four (4) Technical teams. This [...]
|
As stated in Technical Specifications point 2.7 Technical teams and Project Teams, activities can be [...]
|
11/10/2019
|
|
|
26
|
We understand that the aim of the requested examples in this question is to illustrate the structure [...]
|
Your understanding is correct. Nevertheless, it is up to the tenderer to decide on the type of information [...]
|
11/10/2019
|
|
|
25
|
In point 6.1.3 of technical specifications you request that the resources of the Contractor record their [...]
|
ITAM is an activity monitoring tool and does not serve the same purpose as a badging system. As indicated [...]
|
11/10/2019
|
|
|
24
|
(a) Can you please confirm the handover period in case of replacement is 10-15 days? (b) Is Parallel [...]
|
(a) As stated in point 6.3. Replacement of the Technical Specifications "The handover period (where both [...]
|
11/10/2019
|
|
|
28
|
Can you please confirm that it is not obligatory to propose resources with security clearance?
|
As stated in point 5.2. Security Clearance of the Technical Specifications, "All staff proposed by the [...]
|
14/10/2019
|
|
|
20
|
Where is Annex 11?
|
Please find Annex 11 to technical specifications in the technical specifications document page 64.
|
09/10/2019
|
|