|
26
|
Can you confirm that travels that can be requested in the context of the QA4 activities (Missions, audits [...]
|
We do confirm that travels will be requested in the context of QA4 activities (missions, audits, QC of [...]
|
20/03/2017
|
|
|
27
|
According to section “5.1.3 Hand-over” of the Questionnaire, the contractor is called to show its plan [...]
|
We do confirm a clerical mistake. Section “5.1.3 Hand-over” of the Questionnaire should read: "Its proposed [...]
|
20/03/2017
|
|
|
28
|
In case of services provided to a private purchaser certified by the service provider through a declaration [...]
|
We do confirm that the client contact is mandatory. As stated in Section "4.2.1. Client References (Mandatory [...]
|
20/03/2017
|
|
|
29
|
According to the WP2 Take-over, included in “Annex 2b: Technical Annex”, the contractor is called to [...]
|
The QA3 Hand-over Plan will be requested to the existing contractor once the results of QA4 Call for [...]
|
20/03/2017
|
|
|
30
|
Due to the fact that the column width is blocked, the totals are not visible and show as #########. Can [...]
|
The column "Estimated budget TOTAL" of sheet TBP has been extended. An updated Price Table is published [...]
|
24/03/2017
|
|
|
31
|
There are only 35 lines to enter profiles in the Profile Pi Pricing sheet of the price table. Can this [...]
|
No; tenderers can indicate maximum 35 profiles
|
24/03/2017
|
|
|
32
|
As per your answer n° 19, can you please confirm that the tenderer can rely on references of its affiliated [...]
|
No we do not confirm; our reply to Q19 was incomplete and should be read as follows : 1) As per Art 146.5 [...]
|
24/03/2017
|
|
|
33
|
Regarding to the contract notice with No: 2017/S 032-057176 dated on 15.02.2017 under the name "Belgium [...]
|
As indicated in the contract notice under the section IV.1.8, this procedure is covered by the Agreement [...]
|
24/03/2017
|
|
|
34
|
With regard to technical and professional criteria, we understand that if company A aims to provide a [...]
|
Please refer to our replies to questions 19 and 32
|
28/03/2017
|
|
|
35
|
Your response to questions around eligibility and subcontracting for this procedure are contradictory [...]
|
There is indeed an inconsistency in the replies. The reply to Q33 should read "No, you are not eligible [...]
|
28/03/2017
|
|
|
36
|
When completing the V2.00 of the price table we notice that for the Work Packages WP.9.9 the profile [...]
|
This is not correct. WP 9.10 should be linked to the "in contractor's premises" prices calculated in [...]
|
30/03/2017
|
|